The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The line chart illustrates the amount of commodities transported by four kinds of transport in UK from 1974 to 2002.

It is apparent that the largest quantity of goods was transported by road throughout the period, with around 70 million tonnes of goods were transported in 1974, rising to 100 million tonnes in 2002. By strike contrast, transporting goods by pipeline was the most insignificant in 1974, only 5 million tonnes of goods were transported by pipeline. Nevertheless, transporting goods by pipeline become more popular after 1978, quantity of goods transported was increased steadily until 1994, and remaining stable at 22 million tonnes from 1995 to 2002.

The amount of goods conveyed by rail were similar in 1974 and 2002, with around 40 million tonnes of goods conveyed. It was important to note that, the amount of goods conveyed through rail decreased gradually until 1994, and increased back to the level of 1974 in 2002. With regard to the goods transported by water, it was clear that the amounts of good transported from 1982 to 1994 were relatively stable at the level of around 60 million tonnes.

Overall, the transportation of goods in UK is mainly relied on the road. While the quantity of goods transported by pipeline had a considerable increase over the period, pipeline was still the least popular method of transport.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, still, while, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1137.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07589285714 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82444670738 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459821428571 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9444058105 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.333333333 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8888888889 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28471724287 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168189984402 0.103423049105 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555490148496 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218306188638 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415962774974 0.0819641961636 51% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.