The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The line chart illustrates how many million tonnes of products were transported in the UK by different types of modes of transport between the time period of 1974 and 2002.
In general, over 28 years, the quantities of goods transported by road, water, pipeline have increased whilst the quantity transported by rail has remained almost constant.
It can be seen from the chart show that the road remains the most popular method of transporting goods in the UK from 1974 to 2002. The number of goods transported by road in 1974 and 2002 was to 70 million tonnes and 98 million tonnes respectively. It is accounted for the largest quantity of goods transported in this period while the lowest both in 1974 and 2002 was by pipeline about 5 million tonnes and 22 million tonnes respectively.
On the other hand, the number of goods transported by water remained at around 40 million tonnes between 1974 and 1978. Then there was a great rise to approximately 60 million tonnes by 1982. This level remained for over 10 years. However, in the 1990s, there was a decrease to about 50 million tonnes in 1998. Then it was rise to about 65 million tonnes in 2002.
Finally, the number of goods transported by rail gradually fell from 40 million tonnes to around 25 million tonnes from 1974 to 1995. By 1999, the quantity was at 40 million tonnes again and increase slightly by 2002.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 365, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d while the lowest both in 1974 and 2002 was by pipeline about 5 million tonnes ...
^^
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in 1974 and 2002 was by pipeline about 5 million tonnes and 22 million tonnes r...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, then, while, as to, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1136.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71369294606 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57694722753 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.448132780083 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5607068212 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6666666667 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0833333333 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217289622406 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102728424091 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0821837313199 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163598908529 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716135336112 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.66 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.