The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.( book 8 test 4)
A glance at the figure provided reveals the trend of the amount of merchandises transported in Britain during the period from 1974 to 2002 by four kinds of transport.
In general, the number of goods under the four modes of transport(namely road, water, rail and pipeline) increased. it is evident from the graph given that most of the distribution of merchandises used road to transfer.
The most common transport that merchant used, road processed approximately 60 million tonnes of goods in 1974 and 98 million tonnes in 2002. Second in terms of usage, meanwhile, was water. From almost 40 million tonnes in 1974, skyrocketed to nearly 68 million tonnes in 2003.
Conversely, the least quantities of goods transported in the UK was pipeline, at 5 million tonnes and 22 million tonnes in 1974 and 2002 respectively. Rail’s usage remained constant from 1974 to 2002, although it fluctuated during the period in question.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ortnamely road, water, rail and pipeline increased. it is evident from the graph ...
^^
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...d, water, rail and pipeline increased. it is evident from the graph given that mo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, second, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 791.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20394736842 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95508271465 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572368421053 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 215.1 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4433967757 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.875 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191297078107 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834845264196 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627053793031 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126755265152 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442177884631 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.