The graph below shows the total value of exports and the value of fuel, food and manufactured goods exported by one country from 2000 to 2005.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The two line graphs below illustrates, value of fuel exported in million dollar and compares this with that of food and manufacturing goods of a country, over a five-year period from 2000 to 2005.

Overall, worth of fuel exported rocketed in later years, but, if, compared with other commodities it decreased drastically. On the other hand, value of manufactured goods and food remained quite stable.

Value of food exported started at 300000 million dollars and reduced by 150000 million dollars to hit a low in 2002. After this point, a tremendous rise was observed in the value exported till 2005, as the value reached peak of 450000 million dollars. Nevertheless, when, compared with the other commodities value of fuel decreased at a constant rate from over 40000million dollar to below manufactured goods.

Worth of food exported remained constant through-out with nearly 5000 million dollars in 2000 and 2005. Whereas, manufactured goods that started somewhere in between food and fuel at 15000 million dollars increased over a given period to reach to 2000 million dollars.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 66, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
... illustrates, value of fuel exported in million dollar and compares this with that of f...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...exported till 2005, as the value reached peak of 450000 million dollars. Neverthe...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, nevertheless, so, whereas, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27011494253 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74799798612 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505747126437 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0285597763 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.625 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300737193178 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157270166031 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697527343612 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218900610556 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649068065594 0.0819641961636 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.