The graph below shows US consumers' average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010.
Write a report for a university, lecturer describing the information shown below.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart gives information about consumers' average yearly spending on mobile phone and residential phone services in the US from 2001 to 2010.
It is clear that while the figures for cell phone services showed an upward trend, the opposite was true for residential phone services.
As can be seen from the chart, at the beginning of the period, people spent nearly $700 on residential phone services as opposed to only $200 on cell phone services. In the following year, the proportion of money spent on cell phone services climbed by $100. By contrast, US people spent less on residential ones, at $630.
Over the next 4-year-period, the figures for cell phone services continued to soar to approximately $550 in 2006. The comparable amount of money spent on residential phone services was registered in the same year. In the last four years of the period, the data of cell phone services surged and peaked at $750 in 2010. In contrast, that of residential ones experienced a downward trend, hitting the lowest point at $400.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87428571429 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71018637811 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514285714286 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4333312361 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7777777778 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299574480185 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143384137783 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852433892376 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222861921356 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694815228083 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.