The graph describes the changes in water supply and sanitation in urban and rural areas between 1980 and 1990.
The Colum chart illustrates the proportion of water supply and sanitation between urban and rural areas in 1980 and 1990. The survey was conducted by the United Nations.
Overall, it is clear that the category of both water supply and sanitation experienced a growing trend from 1980 to 1990, and the proportion of water supply in urban areas was higher than the one in rural areas.
To begin with, 70% was recorded in the water supply of urban areas in 1980, it went up 1% in 1990. The change in the water supply of rural area was dramatical, climbing from 28% in 1980 to 45% in 1990.
Turning to the figure for sanitation. 59% was depicted in urban areas in 1980, in the ensuing decade, it only increased by 2%. As for sanitation in rural areas, the figure was much lower in 1980 and 1990, with 13% and 14% respectively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
as for, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 684.0 965.302439024 71% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41016366434 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 74.0 106.607317073 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493333333333 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 198.0 283.868780488 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.6714203542 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.539520176076 0.215688989381 250% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.251428526369 0.103423049105 243% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.187684550726 0.0843802449381 222% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.374486938093 0.15604864568 240% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0982891344929 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.