The graph gives information about male and female gym membership between 1980 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph compares the number of gym memberships held by males and females from 1980 to 2010.
Overall, it is seen clearly from the given line chart that, men had the highest number of gym memberships in the starting years, which declined during the period. Whereas women showed constant increments.
To comments with, there were nearly 2200 men were a member in the gyms in 1980, which was nearly double than women. Furthermore, in 1995, the trend of males decreased drastically by twofold after reached a high of 4000 males in 1985. On the other hand, the female trend inclined over 2500 units in the same period.
Moreover, after 1995, the number of male participants increased gaintly and reached a peck of 5000 in 2005, which was nearly two times more than women. In addition, between 2005 and 2010, the trend of women fluctuated between 2000 and 3000 units. However, the number of males showed a downward trend, which was nearly 1000 lower than the former.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ears, which declined during the period. Whereas women showed constant increments. T...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, moreover, whereas, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8622754491 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3017858144 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592814371257 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2142847938 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2222222222 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148294243796 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690061392684 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770202192884 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118160483451 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0912377861846 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.