The graph shows changes in the prices per kilogram of various types of bread in Europe between 2001 and 2005
The line graph illustrates the costs of 4 different types of bread in Europe from 2001 to 2005.
Overall, it is clear that the price of brown bread and wholemeal bread was remain steady however their was the growth of the costs of white and rye bread.
In 2001, white bread had the lowest price among 4 different types, at just 0.1 euros while rye bread was sold at 0.6 euros. The price of white bread upsurged to a peak price of 1.2 euros however the price of white bread crashed dramatically to 0.7 euros in 2003. There was a oscillations of the white bread cost between 0.7 and 0.5 euros until 2005. In 2003 the rye bread price felt to 0.8 euros but it recovered and reached a peak of 1 euros and became the most expensive type of bread over the period.
The price of brown and wholemeal bread showed the similar trend, at around 0.5 euros in the first year of period. The cost of brown bread fluctuate and reach about 0.6 euros by the end of period. There was insignificant change in the retail price of the wholemeal bread which was remain 0.5 euros in 2005.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...tically to 0.7 euros in 2003. There was a oscillations of the white bread cost be...
^
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a oscillation' or simply 'oscillations'?
Suggestion: a oscillation; oscillations
...tically to 0.7 euros in 2003. There was a oscillations of the white bread cost between 0.7 and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 280, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
... price of the wholemeal bread which was remain 0.5 euros in 2005.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 869.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.345 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.13119098159 2.65546596893 80% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.445 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.7399147216 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.5555555556 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300194550757 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157803515737 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724367249324 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216266955167 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776305084848 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.19 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.54 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.