The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London, 2000-2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart gives information regarding the annual income of three bakeries in London over a decade. The vertical axis represents the yearly earnings in the unit of £20,000. The horizontal axis represents the period from 2000-2010.
We can see that the earnings of Robbie's Bakery were very stable in a half decade from 2000-2005 (by £58,000)). They rose steadily in two periods, from 2005 to 2007 (approximately by £20,000), and then again from 2008-2010 (by £10,000), with a considerable growth of around £30,000 in between.
The figure that moved almost with the same pattern is the income of Bernie's Bun. Its earnings were very stable from 2003 to 2007 with a little fluctuation from 2005 to 2007, then reached the highest rise from 2007-2008 (by £20,000). Furthermore, they rose steadily to 2010.
On the other hand, the earnings of Lovely Loaves fluctuated unsteadily. There was a major decline in a decade from £81,000 in 2000 to £40,000 in 2010, even though they rose in the short time in 2001 (by £86,000) and 2004 (by £85,000). After that, Lovely Loaves underwent a huge loss until 2010.
In summary, the earnings of several bakeries in London generally increase in the long run, except for Lovely Loaves.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...yearly earnings in the unit of £20,000. The horizontal axis represents the period f...
^^^
Line 4, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...£86,000 and 2004 by £85,000. After that, Lovely Loaves underwent a huge loss unti...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, regarding, then, except for, in summary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1014.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97058823529 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5978357301 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578431372549 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.8239289287 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130210740604 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615161271917 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517328254114 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0896479726885 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557994887852 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.