The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in Calgary, 2000-2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart depicts the total revenues each year of three bakeries in Calgary over one decade, from 2000 to 2010. Overall, there was an upward trend in yearly income of Amandine Bakery and Bolo Cakery while the opposite was true for Mari Bakeshop over the period given.
Looking at the details, starting with merely almost $20000 per year in 2000, Bolo Cakery overtook the highest one (Mari Bakeshop) in 2008 with more than $60000 in the income. In addition, it became the shop that had more than 1.5 times higher income in compare with only approximately 25% ($20000) of the income in 2000 with the Mari Bakeshop (over $80000).
The trend was similar for Amandine Bakery. Having remained stable at approximately $55,000 in the first half of the decade, revenue then rose sharply, reaching over $100000 in 2010. In contrast, the income of Mari Bakeshop went in the opposite direction. Taking fluctuated around $90,000 until 2004, it started to fall rapidly to just over $40,000 in 2008, the figure then continued to level off in the last two years.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look, then, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 867.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73770491803 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.18991414651 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584699453552 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6738178355 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.375 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0646981991721 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0309954363502 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478652946721 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0485596291194 0.15604864568 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410673879694 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.