The graph provides information about the annual income of three bakeries, 2000-2010.
There are two general trends, downward and upward. In relation to the former, earnings for Mari Bakeshop were down during the whole period in the graph, decreasing from over $80,000 to just $40,000 in 2010.
By contrast, the sales for Amandine Bakery and Bolo Cakery surged. Regarding the first bakery, the income for it remained constant over the first six years, followed by a rise in 2006 and a significant increase in 2008, climbing to more than $100,000 a year in 2010. Likewise, the trend for Bolo Cakery was upward. There were fluctuations in its earnings from 2000 to 2002, after that, it went up suddenly, increasing to approximately $40,000, then the income for Bolo levelled off in 2003-2005, dropping slightly in the following year. By the end of the decade, sales recovered, rising to over $60,000 a year.
It is notable that the earnings for Mari Bakeshop were lower in 2008-2010 than they were for other bakeries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 51, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...ble that the earnings for Mari Bakeshop were lower in 2008-2010 than they were for o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, likewise, regarding, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 840.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94117647059 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53457748845 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 60.4023546267 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3333333333 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180615080921 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823727781209 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119390007253 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16018081302 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141330754166 0.0819641961636 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.