The graph shows the number of visitors to four international museums between 1980 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The information plotted in the given line graph shows a variation in the numbers of visitors who attended four international galleries over 35 years. Those museums are the Louvre, Vatican Museums, the London Science Museum and the Shenzhen Museum.
According to the graphic, the first two most visited museums in 1980 faced a climb in visitors, while the others witnessed a downward trend. The Louvre maintained its first place in popularity, having near 10 million people passing through its doors in 2015. Close to this figure is the Vatican Museum. If in 1980 there were 2500000 fewer visitors between it and the French one, by 2015, this difference became almost inexistent.
Among the least favourited museums, London Science Museum is the only one that experienced a gradual decrease in sightseers. Starting from about 4 million people, by 2015, the number dropped to approximately 2 million yearly. Meanwhile, Shenzhen's visitors' number fluctuated but never surpassed 4000000.
Overall, between 1980 and 2015, the Louvre kept its first position in visitors choice, even if recently the Vatican Museums caught the interest of almost the same number of people.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 989.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34594594595 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61532260816 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643243243243 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6955038118 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.1 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270481607182 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977125755714 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634248836289 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164789643256 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561697349859 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 989.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34594594595 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61532260816 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643243243243 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6955038118 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.1 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270481607182 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977125755714 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634248836289 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164789643256 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561697349859 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.