The graph shows the percentage of people who use mobile phones in four situations, grouped into four age groups
The bar chart describes the proportion of four typical phone situations by using cell phones with four different group ages.
Overall, The most frequent use of cell phones in 4 conditions belongs to the 18-29 aged group while people who are 65 or above show opposite sites. Public Transports and Streets are two situations that are called most in all kinds of age groups.
The youngest group from 18 to 29 have the highest rate of using the cell phone in public transport at 90% then followed by 30 to 49 with 80% and 50 to 64 with 70%. The percentage of the people are 65 or above who call in public transport is at lower 60%. Moreover, a group of 30 to 49 years old who use the cell phone in the street has over 80%, while others are a bit lower than it. In addition, half of the percentage of people age from 18 to 29 call cell phones at the restaurant. This figure is followed by age of 30 to 49 and 50 to 64 and 65 above respectively at 40%, 30%, and 18%. Furthermore, only the rate of the people around 18 to 29 call on family dinner which accounted for nearly 20%, whereas others are approximately at 10%.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 108, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...gs to the 18-29 aged group while people who are 65 or above show opposite sites. Public...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, then, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.23474178404 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39920343559 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507042253521 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.2195299591 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.222222222 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316057111489 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141966940256 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103225714118 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261509661801 0.15604864568 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0771397161089 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.97 61.2550243902 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.55 11.4140731707 66% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 108, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...gs to the 18-29 aged group while people who are 65 or above show opposite sites. Public...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, then, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.23474178404 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39920343559 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507042253521 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.2195299591 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.222222222 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316057111489 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141966940256 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103225714118 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261509661801 0.15604864568 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0771397161089 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.97 61.2550243902 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.55 11.4140731707 66% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.