The graph shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK.
The provided line graph illustrates information on the proportion of using advanced technologies namely CD player, mobile phone, Internet access and home computer in British households over the course of 7 years, commencing from 1996 to 20/3.
As can be seen from the graph, it is evidently clear that the percentage of domestic access to technology in the UK at home witnessed an upward trend over the period shown. In addition, Internet access increased sharply in its contribution compared to the others.
In 1996/97, the figure for CD players, mobile phones and home computers accounted for 60%, 19% and 24% respectively, showing that CD players were the most accessible in UK households. In contrast, no one had access to the Internet in this period. In the next years, CD players and home computers rose constantly, especially CD players still kept the highest position and reached a point of approximately 80% in 2002/03 in comparison with the percentage of three categories. There was a wide fluctuation in the proportion of mobile phones usage and then climbed to about 65% and surpassed home computer. Additionally, Internet access appeared in 1998/99 and went up steadily about 42% at the end of the year 2002/03.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 185, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e the most accessible in UK households. In contrast, no one had access to the Inte...
^^
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... access to the Internet in this period. In the next years, CD players and home com...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, still, then, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12437810945 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93339172465 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616915422886 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2669841207 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.75 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237937321501 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0979327551848 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079840891321 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175639970953 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641685000308 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.