The graph shows the rates of participation in three activities in a UK sports club between 1983 and 2003

The line graph compares the percentage of UK members in terms of 3 different sport clubs, namely swimming, team sports and gym activities in the period of 2 decades starting from 1983.
Overall, it can be seen that while the participation rates in team sports and gym had an upward trend from 1983 to 2003, the opposite tendency was true for the proportion of people taking part in swimming club.
In 1983, nearly 30% of the total people chose to become a member of sports requiring team spirit. This figure was fivefold than the rate of participation in gym activities, at approximately 7%. Over 20 years, people tended to pour into the two club mentioned above, resulting in the increase in the recorded data. There was a modest fluctuation in the proportion of team sports' members. The figure gradually went up to 38% in 1998 and then followed by a slight decline to only over 30%. In contrast, a significant growth was seen in the percentage of gym participants, from 7% in 2983, rising to 15% in the next 10 years, reaching a peak of 28% at the end of the period.
However, the period witnessed a sharp decrease in the figure of swimming group. Standing at the highest point at 50% in 1983, over a 2 decade period, the figure bottomed at 12%, which was also the lowest percentage compared to other club members.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sharp decrease in the figure of swimming group. Standing at the highest point at ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1085.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6170212766 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6471847581 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578723404255 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6219487212 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212518920627 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771047470301 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762682313236 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14360899472 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.072788888933 0.0819641961636 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.