The graph shows the spending on research into renewable energy of four countries from 1975 to 2000.
The giver line chart compares and contrasts the amount of investment on renewable energy researching changes, measured in dollars per person, among four European countries in a 25 year period, from 1975 to 2000.
Generally speaking, the overall spending had been growing throughout the span, and Switzerland and Denmark paid more attention on green energy programmes than Spain and the UK.
The most noticeable growth can be seen in Switzerland, which the spending was far greater than any other four countries. With an initial start in 1975, the expenditure surged to about $2.5/person in 1980, after which it rapidly climbed to almost $5/person in 1995 then gradually reached to the top in 2000 at 5.1 dollars per person.
Denmark experienced a sharp growth in the first five years in this period as well. However, this figure remained a slight growth before it touched the highest point in 2000, which was exact 3$/person.
The investment increase in Spain and the UK was relatively slow. After Spain hit the peak at 1$/person in 1980 and the UK reached the vertex at nearly $1/person in 1985, both countries saw different levels of declining by 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 191, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$3'.
Suggestion: $3
... highest point in 2000, which was exact 3$/person. The investment increase in S...
^^
Line 9, column 94, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$1'.
Suggestion: $1
...ively slow. After Spain hit the peak at 1$/person in 1980 and the UK reached the v...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, then, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 969.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.046875 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57061194853 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661458333333 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5495817151 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.125 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19971751439 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766966291442 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0927765456884 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110389897862 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102513830457 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.