The bar charts illustrate the proportion of people who owned their personal computers in terms of general population and level of education from 2002 to 2010.
It can be seen clearly in the first graph that the number of computer ownership had gradually increased during period. Starting from the year of 2002 with just around 58%, citizens seemed then to purchase more computers by 2004, 2006 and 2008 with about 60%, 65% and 70%, respectively. Particularly, the rate reached over 70% in the last year shown.
Meanwhile, the ratios tend to be more optimistic in the second chart due to its stronger rise by years and education levels. For no high school diploma, it was just 15% in 2002 and luckily climbed up to 45% in 2010, which was a significant progress. The percentages continually accelerated for upper levels including high school graduate, college, bachelor's degree and postgraduate qualification in both 2002 and 2010. As the highest level of postgraduation, there were respectively 80% and roughly 95% of students owning computers, however, the difference between the two years' datas had been mitigated in comparisons with other categories.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'significant progress'.
Suggestion: significant progress
...ly climbed up to 45% in 2010, which was a significant progress. The percentages continually accelerate...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17647058824 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90537274183 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.689839572193 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.827609734 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365284107908 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12606746367 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735389528415 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222415217128 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454787411747 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.