The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graphs illustrate the proportion of computer owner in the period of 2002 and 2010 and the comparison amongst the education level of people who has a computer in two years 2002 and 2010. Generally speaking, the number of computer holder had been gradually increasing during the period. The increasing trend can be seen in all of the owners of all education level.
It is obvious that there were more and more people owning a computer from 2002 to 2010. The time period experienced a climb from approximately 58% of the population in 2002 to more than 70% in 2010, the increase of 12% in 8 years. The steady rise is about 3% of the total population per year.
From 2002 to 2010, it is noticeable that the higher the education level, the bigger the proportion of computer owner. The number of people who do not gain high school diploma owns a computer was 15% of the population while this proportion was nearly 80% in case of postgraduates. However, the percentage of computer owners who do not have high school qualification soar almost triple in comparison to 2002 and 2010 while the higher education level ones had slighter climbs. The increase in computer ownership between two years was a mere of 5%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 326, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...od. The increasing trend can be seen in all of the owners of all education level. It is...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 546, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hip between two years was a mere of 5%.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73113207547 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65982113147 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490566037736 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.545139381 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.3 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.2 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319411374981 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141133450705 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0898374599559 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22664459376 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0162783602331 0.0819641961636 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.