The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graphs illustrate the proportion of computer owner in the period of 2002 and 2010 and the comparison amongst the education level of people who has the gadget in two years 2002 and 2010. It is of note that the overall trend of the number of computer users was steadily upwards in all education level.
At first glance, there were more and more people owning a computer from 2002 to 2010. The time period experienced a climb from approximately 58% of the population in 2002 to more than 70% in 2010, the increase of 12% in 8 years. The steady rise is about 3% of the total population per year.
From 2002 to 2010, it is noticeable that the higher the education level of the computer users, the higher the proportion of the users over the population. In 2002, the number of people who do not gain high school diploma owns the device was 15% of the population while this proportion was nearly 80% in case of postgraduates. Notwithstanding, the percentage of computer owners who do not have high school qualification soar almost triple in comparison to 2002 and 2010 while the higher education level ones had slighter climbs. The increase in the percentage of postgraduates who had a computer was a mere of 5% in 2010 compared to 2002.
Overall, the proportion of computer users was steadily increased over the period of 8 years. The percentage of lower educated users was substantially less than the higher educated ones but the differences tend to be shortened.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 343, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... case of postgraduates. Notwithstanding, the percentage of computer owners who do...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1218.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 256.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7578125 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79748596679 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.44921875 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 366.3 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5522527591 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.727272727 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2727272727 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.27272727273 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302937204896 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136126910904 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772934417124 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198039567505 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0813688515396 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.