The graphs below indicate the effect of treatment in two types of cancer in females.
Using the information in the graphs, describe and compare the situation with and without treatment for the two types of cancer.
The graphs show the difference in results between treated and untreated female patients of two kinds of cancer.
Obviously, for alimentary tract cancer, the treatment has proved the clear effect. The survival rate decreases to nearly 75% after the first year from diagnosis. From then on, the figure remains stable at around 50% from the second year to the fifth year. On the other hand, the percentage of survived patients who are not treated after one year is only about 40%, and then continues to drop and stay steady at 25% from the second year.
In regard to Lymphosarcoma, there is a significant drop of the survival rate for patients who applied treatment. The rate is approximately 60% after the first year but kept decreasing dramatically in the following years, hitting the lowest number at 0% in the fifth year. For this type of cancer, the patients without treatment have more chance to continue living. The survival rate went down to more than 40% and stay almost unchanged after five years.
In summary, the alimentary tract cancer patients should follow the treatment to increase the chance of living. Whereas, for lymphosarcoma, the patients should not join especially from the second year from diagnosis.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, then, whereas, in summary, in regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07389162562 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59878246776 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536945812808 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3758821251 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6363636364 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161071256054 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816848785206 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0963468863968 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112674456695 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364112516451 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.