The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graphs given illustrate the number of Australian students, divided in freshmen and the total, who decided to undertake a college career either abroad or locally between 2000-2010.
Overall, the number of students in general has increased. Furthermore, it can be immediately noticed that there has been a huge increment of student migration overseas.
More in detail, students leaving their home country from their first year constantly grew, going from about 10000 in 2001 to just over 40000 in 2010. Meanwhile, the same cannot be said regarding local students: although their number is consistently bigger, its fluctuations are almost irrelevant, oscillating around 200000 new enrolments per year for the whole decade.
The total student’s pattern is worth of notice too. Even though freshmen didn't grow much, local studies boomed during the first seven years, growing from 400000 to 600000, plateauing until 2010.
Regarding overseas students, the growth was consistent, with a linear trend, staring at 20000 to just above 80000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 74, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...rth of notice too. Even though freshmen didnt grow much, local studies boomed during ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, regarding, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54037267081 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64211074701 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.76397515528 0.547539520022 140% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2181646222 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151359963776 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640428296434 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0259641846439 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.072179172221 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285938874756 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.