The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten-year period.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graphs compare the number of overseas students and Australian students attending universities between 2001 and 2010.
It is clear that the enrolment of both overseas students and local students rise over the period shown. Overall, the total number of Australian students enrolling is much higher than the overseas number. But the commencing number of indigenous students is lower than the foreign ones.
In 2001, starting overseas students went to Australian universities is at about 12.000, and the total number is 20.000. The figures for local students stood at just around 18.000, but the total number is twice the sum of the overseas students. Overall attendance of overseas students increased gradually over the following years, peaked in 2010 at 80.000, a fourfold increase compared to 2001. The total number of local students also increased, before reaching over 600.000 students in 2007, and remained stable the next three years.
While the number of overseas commencing learners saw a stable increase over the 10 years, stood at 40.000 in 2010, the figures for Australian students enrolling for the first time fluctuated, falling between 2002 and 2006, reaching 21.000 in 2008 and dropping to 20.000 in 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing universities between 2001 and 2010. It is clear that the enrolment of both o...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tudents is lower than the foreign ones. In 2001, starting overseas students went...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1043.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34871794872 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55106428654 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502564102564 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2688779238 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.888888889 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267595797978 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15860485941 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807068324614 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206133908577 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711829792725 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.