The graphs below show the number of visitors to two cities in a given year. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant

Essay topics:

The graphs below show the number of visitors to two cities in a given year. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant

The two bar graphs illustrates the quantity of tourists in two metropolitan in an Annum
From January to July, the number of tourists in Seattle followed and increasing trend, rising from around 200000 to 20000000. It remained constant from July to august at 20000000. From August to September,The figure of tourists decreased from 20000000 to 2500000. The figure of tourists experienced a remarkable decline from October to November, declining from 2500000 to 200000
From January to July, the figure of tourists made a fascinating improvement, elevating from around 200000 to 4000000. The quantity of tourists remained same from July to august at 4000000. From August to november, number of tourists plunged from 4000000 to 500000. In december, the figure of tourist showed handsome improvement, rising from 500000 to 2500000
As far comparison is concerned, both tourist places showed magnificent improvement during mid-year and then faced downfall after remaining constant in july and august.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... illustrates the quantity of tourists in two metropolitan in an Annum From Janu...
^^
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ourists in two metropolitan in an Annum From January to July, the number of tour...
^^^
Line 2, column 205, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , The
...st at 20000000. From August to September,The figure of tourists decreased from 20000...
^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['if', 'so', 'then']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.27485380117 0.268076937826 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.12865497076 0.116061578633 111% => OK
Adjectives: 0.046783625731 0.0759168565197 62% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0116959064327 0.0366838410393 32% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.00584795321637 0.0131127313244 45% => OK
Prepositions: 0.175438596491 0.155750635184 113% => OK
Participles: 0.046783625731 0.0379272487307 123% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.86772480017 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0760233918129 0.0210936926555 360% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0701754385965 0.0948980150116 74% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0 0.00967000014798 0% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 999.0 1161.00487805 86% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.9 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.52941176471 5.90752243213 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73763899035 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.522875816993 0.337110787985 155% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.366013071895 0.247514529752 148% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.281045751634 0.171178102325 164% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.143790849673 0.112407865282 128% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86772480017 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 106.607317073 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496732026144 0.546246751206 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 38.6263397405 49.3433353143 78% => OK
How many sentences: 7.0 8.93414634146 78% => OK
Sentence length: 21.8571428571 23.0094962315 95% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.0687279576 42.9750493124 196% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.714285714 135.714022679 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 23.0094962315 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.428571428571 0.689975730869 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.48048780488 203% => OK
Readability: 58.4584500467 47.7609492067 122% => OK
Elegance: 3.4 2.94281807926 116% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275332361151 0.418131533498 66% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.28460545857 0.181151798455 157% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.12615397417 0.0850326197045 148% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.776965058401 0.706616315825 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.136864868533 0.157042692854 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165244575172 0.228904883108 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0961560613298 0.108899403657 88% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.31428586561 0.367819155151 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.293293843845 0.0812612215331 361% => No any connections among paragraphs
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208047351779 0.316326947829 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763065714308 0.0921553760075 83% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70731707317 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.08536585366 73% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.16585365854 126% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.02926829268 66% => OK
Total topic words: 6.0 7.1512195122 84% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.