The pictorial graph illustrates the professional population of Freedonian workers based on their gender segregation over the years 1975 and 1995.
As depicted, over the aforementioned years people were active in different six career segmentations, namely, manufacturing, communications, Finance/banking, wholesales & retail trade, and public sector. However, the public sector is divided into the defense and non-defense sectors.
A quick cruise through the chart indicates that in all of the groups, males filled the greatest number of job vacancies. Related to the mention statistic, the non-defense public sector had recruited the highest number of men, approximately 87,000, while the lowest number of men were occupied by the communications sector. Another significant feature, pertinent to the latent report belongs to the female who had the lowest number of professional engagements in the defense public sector with nearly 20,000. In contrast, the non-defense public sector is the one with the highest female financial activities.
As can be seen clearly, the other interesting feature of the graph is related to the eye-catching gap between men and women occupation in all of the career groups, excluding the communications sector, which both genders hovered around 290,000, however, the other groups have at least 150,000 more men in their sectors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 52, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ise through the chart indicates that in all of the groups, males filled the greatest numbe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'communications'' or 'communication's'?
Suggestion: communications'; communication's
...west number of men were occupied by the communications sector. Another significant feature, pe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 139, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...gap between men and women occupation in all of the career groups, excluding the communicat...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 179, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'communications'' or 'communication's'?
Suggestion: communications'; communication's
...all of the career groups, excluding the communications sector, which both genders hovered arou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, at least, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1166.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74384236453 4.92477711251 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16737987476 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600985221675 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.1635440377 43.030603864 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.75 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144541921197 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676592147485 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342096543629 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0829984017648 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481975193581 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 11.4140731707 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.