The graphs below show the percentage of the highest level of education of Chinese women in the year 1990 and 2004. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The graphs below make a comparison between the percentage of the highest level of education of Chinese women in the year 1990 and 2004.
It is clearly that the highest level of education of Chinese women has been improved since 1990, as the elementary education and junior high school’s percentage has decreased steeply, especially for elementary education, going down from 35% to 5%, which takes the greatest percentage before. The junior high school drops down from 35% to 15%, which is also a great progress.
The proportion of college, university and senior high school has witnessed an increase. For university, the percentage has gone up from 5% to 25%, which has become the greatest part in 2004. The percentage of college and has increased up 5% (5% to 10%).and the percentage of senior high school and has increased up 20% (5% to 25%).
In conclusion, the highest level of education of Chinese women is going up and up, the quality of education has a bright future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 357, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'great progress'.
Suggestion: great progress
...ops down from 35% to 15%, which is also a great progress. The proportion of college, university...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: 5%
...centage of college and has increased up 5% 5% to 10%.and the percentage of senior hig...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 814.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90361445783 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69976316548 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469879518072 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.7294262416 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.285714286 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286856588397 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157871107539 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.197151558335 0.0843802449381 234% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24941736073 0.15604864568 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.210689735657 0.0819641961636 257% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.