The graphs below show the percentage of the highest level of education of Chinese women in the year 1990 and 2004. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The given pie charts elucidate the proportions of the highest education level of Chinese women in the year 1990 and 2004 respectively.
Overall, the primary five degrees for Chinese women are university, college, senior high school, junior high school and elementary education. We can easily distinguish a considerable change between the given two diagrams.
In the year 1990, only 5% of Chinese women can got university education while 10% of them had college degree. The proportion of senior high school degree just reached 5%. We can see most of Chinese women in 1990 only had junior high school education or elementary education while both of the percentages were 35%.
Compared with the situation in 1990, the highest level of education of Chinese women in 2004 had greatly improved. University education had the largest proportion which reached 30%. The percentage was 6 times larger than that in 2004. Thanks to the improvement in education these years, half of the women in China were able to get college education and senior high school education while both of the proportions were 25%. The figure of junior high school decreased from 35%to 15% while the smallest number of elementary education was just 5%.
In conclusion, thanks to the improvement in education these years, the number of Chinese women who can have tertiary education are increasing. The degree of women in China are getting higher.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 71, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 1990, the highest level of education of Chinese women in 2004 had greatly improv...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 3.97073170732 453% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1188.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1652173913 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66952273015 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460869565217 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 367.2 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1458655094 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3846153846 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6923076923 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.53846153846 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235548364211 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105089648452 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0917368079208 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166155039641 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850494665476 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.