The graphs below show the post-school qualifications held by Canadians in the age groups 25 to 35 and 45 to 55.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the qualifications, which had been held by citizens of in age group 25 to 35 and 45 to 55 in Canada. The data is in the percentage.
Overall, it is seen clearly from both pie graphs that degrees in social science and arts were the most selected in both groups.
To comments with, the age group of 25 to 35-year-old people had nearly 19%, 20% and 15% degrees in the field of administration, social science and arts, and education respectively. On the other hand, around 15%, 23% and 13% degrees in the area of administration, social science and arts, and education had been held by the age group of 45 to 55. Moreover, nearly 18% of people from 25 to 35 age group gad degree in science, maths and computer, which was eight per cent higher than 45 to 55 age people.
Furthermore, 45 to 55 age people group had been chosen to studying in engineering and humanities, which accounted for 19% and 5%, and both were 10% and 1% higher compared to another group respectively. In addition, qualifications in nursing and MBA comprised of 7% and 5% for the age of 25 to 35 old ones in order. Whereas same degrees accounted for in order of 12% and 3% for 45 to 55 age group. In contrast, other areas remained relatively the same for each one.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, whereas, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48484848485 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78246227064 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484848484848 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.711044162 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.6 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236783945129 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103560674777 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661774812071 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148570656484 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588515963269 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.