The graphs illustrate the proportions of water used by different states in the year 2000.
The data demonstrates that the global water usage differs a lot from how it is used in certain states. For example, 92 per cent of water spent by India was used in agriculture, while on global the amount was 22 per cent lower at 70 per cent, with only 8 per cent went to domestic and industrial sectors. In contrast, Canada had the lowest proportion of water used in agriculture at 8 per cent, though its industry used 80 per cent of water consumed by the whole country, which was 58 per cent more than the global average. Also, New Zealand had its own pattern to use its water sources. This nation had the highest proportion of water used by households and stood at 46 per cent, twice as high as global level, while China was an average water consumer, as its water consumption breakdown was almost identical to the world’s average.
To sum up, it is obvious that the ways countries utilized their water resources in the year 2000 varied.
The graphs illustrate the proportions of water used by different states in the year 2000.
The data demonstrates that the global water usage differs a lot from how it is used in certain states. For example, 92 per cent of water spent by India was used in agriculture, while on global the amount was 22 per cent lower at 70 per cent, with only 8 per cent went to domestic and industrial sectors. In contrast, Canada had the lowest proportion of water used in agriculture at 8 per cent, though its industry used 80 per cent of water consumed by the whole country, which was 58 per cent more than the global average. Also, New Zealand had its own pattern to use its water sources. This nation had the highest proportion of water used by households and stood at 46 per cent, twice as high as global level, while China was an average water consumer, as its water consumption breakdown was almost identical to the world’s average.
To sum up, it is obvious that the ways countries utilized their water resources in the year 2000 varied.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, for example, in contrast, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60215053763 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51217408132 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575268817204 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.6184362684 43.030603864 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.285714286 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.622962922922 0.215688989381 289% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.337088986604 0.103423049105 326% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.180568554515 0.0843802449381 214% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.408047714768 0.15604864568 261% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.203956350079 0.0819641961636 249% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.