he chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart provides the information about the percentage of people using multiple social networking sites in Canada for the year of 2014 and 2015.
The comparison among multiple social networking usage is relatively increased from one sites to two sites. Meanwhile, the multiple sites usage shows a decreasing trend from two sites to five sites. The multiple networking sites usage in Canada grew slightly about one to four percent from the year of 2014 to 2015.
The highest percentage of people using networking sites is categorized in one site user which is slightly declined from 36% to 28% in respective years. The number of people who use more than one platform are gradually decreased respectively from two sites user to five sites user, and also the number rises from 2014 to 2015. Conversely, the percentage of users who have one site or do not have it at all are dropped slowly in 2015. In addition, the chart indicates lesser contrast between 2014 and 2015 for the two sites user and no site user.
Therefore, the data illustrates that people tend to have more than one site platform for social networking subsequently. Likewise, social networking is dominated by one site and two sites users in respective years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sites'' or 'site's'?
Suggestion: sites'; site's
...s to two sites. Meanwhile, the multiple sites usage shows a decreasing trend from two...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ed from 36% to 28% in respective years. The number of people who use more than one ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, likewise, so, therefore, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97584541063 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61138705322 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.449275362319 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.8969110127 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274432108622 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146013179955 0.103423049105 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.092143930334 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220651712937 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103175343503 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.