Hjjv
The presented bar chart illustrates the number of people who died of flu from March to August, include males and females. The line chart demonstrates flu rates for women and men during the eleven months. However, the pie chart shows the number of females recipients of new vaccine classified into 4 groups.
Overall, more female got an affected by an epidemic than male and female deaths rate from this epidemic was more than male counterparts.
In term of bar chart, from March to May there was no data given for male died of flu, whereas the number of death who was female were 1. In the period from June to August, it experienced an significant increase in its number that 4 female deaths and 2 male deaths.
According to the second pie chart, the total of female recipients of new vaccine who were over 65 years old made up 35%, followed by babies or children with 24%, only 13% were hospitalizer. Meanwhile, the figure of people not given the vaccine account for 28%.
In the third line chart, it saw a sharp growth in the new cases of flu for 5 months (from Feb to Jun). There were just under 1000 cases that the sick people were females in March, reaching at peak in Jun (at 3500 cases), more than 1000 cases of males. After that, the number of cases dropped slowly to about 3000 in Jul, before levelling off at 2500 for the rest of the year. For males, the figures were lower but showed a similar trend throughout the epidemic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...iod from June to August, it experienced an significant increase in its number that...
^^
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for 5 months from Feb to Jun. There were just under 1000 cases that the sick peop...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, second, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1176.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 262.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48854961832 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26898686224 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 106.607317073 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553435114504 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.605533095 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.