The tables illustrate the sales amount of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in five nations of Europe in 1999 and 2004.
The first table clearly shows that the sales of Fairtrade coffee in all nations have increased in varying degrees from 1999 to 2004. In two places, Denmark and Sweden, the sales just increase by 2 million euros only. By contrast, the sales of UK and Switzerland had a dramatic rise, with the revenues rising by 18.5 million and 3 million euros respectively.
On the other hand, the second table accounted for the sales of Fairtrade bananas. UK was the country with highest sales in both years, and the sales were much higher than that of other countries. In addition, UK figures rose significantly from 15 million to 47 million euros across these years, while in Switzerland and Denmark sales only grew from 1 million to 5.5 million and from 0.6 million to 4 million respectively. For Belgium and Sweden, the different pattern of sales can be observed, the bananas sales of two countries halved between 1999 and 2004.
By comparing two tables, it is apparent that sales of Fairtrade coffee grew in all European nations, while sales of Fairtrade bananas only went up in three out of five nations. Overall, UK had the greatest sales amount in both Fairtrade products among the all nations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 102, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the highest'.
Suggestion: with the highest
...f Fairtrade bananas. UK was the country with highest sales in both years, and the sales were...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1100.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91071428571 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64308336387 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491071428571 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1307488659 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310813506805 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155753086663 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128348014444 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248866500333 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122764257482 0.0819641961636 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.