International tourism has brought enormous benefits to many places. At the same time, there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment.
Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Nowadays, travelling in the different places of the whole world become a refreshing and entertainment sources of human life. Although huge amount of tourists may causes of environmental pollution and also disturbance of local people's however it also vast earning opportunity and learning culture of different local peoples . In my opinion, travellers should be more concern about environment and local residents and maintain the cleanliness rules to help to make that place clean and beautyful which also give more benefit to local people.
The greatest benefit travelling in various places, its best earning source for the local inhibitants also good chance to build a communication with different people. Many tourist places are situated in country side with all natural beauties. So the local people can earn by selling thei traditional stuffs and things to tourist which can help to spread their traditions in the worldwide. For example, last year I visited Cox's bazar and I brought so many traditional stones and dresses from that places which represent their culture. Local peoples earn lots of money by selling various dresses, foods and ancient stones so on which beneficial for all.
The main drawback is tourist places always busy with differents people of the whole world in this case some people are not aware about environment. They through dust anywhere such as chips package plastic bottle so on. Which also harmful for environment and local people. Because living places become dirtier and worst for inhibitants. Such kinds of carelessness behaves are harmful for tourist places.
All in all, except some drawback, there are huge beneficial scenario of travelling. Which bring so many benefits for tourist and local people of tourist places though it has some problems.I think, government and people together take some initiative step to save and keep clean of tourist places then such kind of error or problem can be solved.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 323, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...rning culture of different local peoples . In my opinion, travellers should be mor...
^^
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[3]
Message: You should probably use 'behave'.
Suggestion: behave
...inhibitants. Such kinds of carelessness behaves are harmful for tourist places. All in...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 34, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aces. All in all, except some drawback, there are huge beneficial scenario of tr...
^^
Line 4, column 62, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'scenarios'?
Suggestion: scenarios
...me drawback, there are huge beneficial scenario of travelling. Which bring so many bene...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 189, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...rist places though it has some problems.I think, government and people together t...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, then, for example, i think, kind of, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 965.302439024 169% => OK
No of words: 311.0 196.424390244 158% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25080385852 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62300728972 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 106.607317073 165% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565916398714 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 283.868780488 175% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1250548625 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.866666667 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7333333333 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1500804678 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574931464067 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413422334002 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.099692856655 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0173688031969 0.0819641961636 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 40.7170731707 184% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.