The Internet is viewed as an excellent means pf communication by many. However, there are some who would argue that it is actually destroying our communication skills.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
People of the world should thank the Internet for it's immense contribution to the society as it has made our lives easier, faster and better. However, like everything has its negatives, Internet too has some drawbacks that alter our basic communication skills. Whether or not internet spoiling our communication skills is discussed below before giving final verdict.
During early days, people had to wait for days to week to know the well-being of their beloved ones that live far away from them. But, today the story is entirely different and this is because of the internet becoming part of our life. It has made our lives so much better by decreasing the distance between the people and thus providing many advantages along with it. Few of such pros are chat forums, Messengers, chat rooms and video calling options that connect people globally and then enable to share information. Furthermore, these act as an excellent platform to showcase one's linguistic talents and can also be used to improve it if one is lagging behind. Any language has to be polished with thorough practice and internet provides us the connection with people that are able to help.
In contrast, many believe that communication skills was getting off the guard because of the Internet itself. Firstly, this is because of the shortcuts that people opt to use in chat which makes people to habituate to such formality and thus destroying the original language. Secondly, as internet offered online banking in order to pay bills and transactions etc.,on the fingertips, making people hardly to step out and talk to people on the way and around. Furthermore, inhibiting people to practice their skills as it is undergrounded. Finally, if people choose to or fail to communicate with people that possess less skills might not also help to the one that had intention to improve.
In my opinion, i partially agree with both the arguments because when rightly used, the internet provides an excellent platform to learn communication skills. So, instead of using internet in such a way that lowers their skills in communication then it is by far better to choose ways in which they can improve.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t alter our basic communication skills. Whether or not internet spoiling our communicat...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'Whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: Whether
...t alter our basic communication skills. Whether or not internet spoiling our communication ski...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 365, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , on
...order to pay bills and transactions etc.,on the fingertips, making people hardly to...
^^^
Line 5, column 617, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun skills is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...to communicate with people that possess less skills might not also help to the one t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, as to, in contrast, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 5.60731707317 606% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1810.0 965.302439024 188% => OK
No of words: 362.0 196.424390244 184% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 3.73543355544 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69580000892 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 106.607317073 188% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552486187845 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 283.868780488 197% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.539720902 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.125 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4375 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179858504517 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675984074147 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733264369772 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135532408854 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807037030361 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 40.7170731707 199% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.