The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The information about the number of visitors to several museums in London from June to September 2013 is illustrated in the line chart.
Overall, people were more likely to visit British Museum over the year, while the Science museum saw the least number of visitors. In any case, another counterpart showed some changes.
In June, the number of visitors to the British Museum was by far more popular with 600 thousand people, followed by Natural History Museum with just above 500 thousand. Meanwhile, the figure for Science Museum only sold 400 thousand tickets, being the lowest number. By September, the figure for British museum had increased to around 650 thousand persons, while Science and Natural one had to settle in a similar number about 450 thousand.
Between July and August, the figure for Natural History Museum experienced downward trends to just under 400 thousand visitors. However, British Museum took up an increasing number of people in July to well under 800 thousand, but it decreased dramatically to 500 thousand. When it came to Science Museum, the figure was showed upward trends to around 450 thousand visitors with a slight decrease in July.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the figure for Science Museum only sold 400 thousand tickets, being the lowest n...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, well, while, in any case
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 988.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14583333333 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44381304977 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546875 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1481883184 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.777777778 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178720344408 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0941656384968 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113713958126 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161234245323 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14323510534 0.0819641961636 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.