The line graph shows how many people visited to three museums in London, namely British Museum, Science Museum and Natural History Museum, recorded in thousands, from June to September in 2013.
It is obvious from the graph that there was a rise in the number of visitors to British Museum and Science Museum while Natural History Museum followed a downward trend over the period.
In June, British Museum was the highest visitors number and was more than Natural History Museum by about 50000 ,whereas the lowest was Science Museum at 400000 visitors. The amount of visitors to British Museum went up significantly to hit a peak , over 700000 visitors, in July but the others decreased till nearly the same visitors number around 350000. There was no change in Natural History Museum visitors number in August ,while Science Museum still fell steadily and also a dramatic drop in British Museum to a low of 500000 visitors, however, the number of British Museum visitors increased till more than at the beginning by 50000 visitors in September. The other museum also climbed to about 450000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...an Natural History Museum by about 50000 ,whereas the lowest was Science Museum at...
^^
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...seum went up significantly to hit a peak , over 700000 visitors, in July but the o...
^^
Line 5, column 429, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...History Museum visitors number in August ,while Science Museum still fell steadily...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03296703297 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31263131712 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510989010989 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.4396373857 43.030603864 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.666666667 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3333333333 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217891470769 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135665939731 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485513647388 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178036217271 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411183198674 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.