The line graph compares the monthly visits in 3 different museums in London from June to September 2013.
Overall, it is clearly evident that, British museum was by far the most visited museum, as opposed to a few people going to Science museum over the four-month period.
Moving to a more detailed analysis, in June, as much as 600 thousand people patronized the British museum, which was predominantly higher than the number who went to either Natural History or Science museum. More precisely, a little over 500 thousand and approximately 400 thousand persons visited Natural History museum and Science museum respectively. However, within the time frame, foreigners who paid visit to British museum fluctuated to finish off at around 650 thousand.
With regards to records on the other two museums, both experienced a fairly similar declining trend over three months. Decreasing steadily from around 500 thousand, the figure for Natural Science museum rose slightly to under 500 thousand with a significant gap close for foreigners who resorted to Science museum.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he other two museums, both experienced a fairly similar declining trend over thre...
^^
Line 7, column 317, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eigners who resorted to Science museum.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34117647059 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65856323557 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647058823529 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4372538673 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.714285714 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.14285714286 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182421275095 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103893973362 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106581937914 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14963254872 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12063239232 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.