The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000
The line graph compares the eating of fast food by Australian youngsters in terms of the amount and kinds of food over a period of 25 years.
Overall, Australia saw a high amount of convenience food eaten by teenagers. Hamburgers and pizza were becoming more common; however, there was a drop in the consumption of fish and chips.
In 1975, fish and chips were the first choice of fast food for Australian youth, attracting people to have it 100 times annually. By contrast, hamburgers and pizza were only eaten 10 times and 5 times respectively. Ten years later, there was a sudden rise in the amount of hamburgers, to nearly 90 times per year, while fish and chips consumption dropped to the same number of times with hamburgers.
The downward trend of fish and chips continued to fall dramatically to less than 40 times a year in 2000. In comparison, the number of times people ate hamburgers and pizza spontaneously grew until they reached their peaks at 100 times and 85 times respectively in 1995. After that, these consumption levels remained stable until 2000.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86956521739 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71083992871 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570652173913 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1928181472 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5555555556 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148223477265 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695299455532 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08669193966 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113570441349 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0959851794942 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.