The line graph below shows changes in the amount of fast food eaten by teenagers from Australia for 1975 to 2000.
The line graph compares the ratio of three various kind of junk food consumed by Australian youth in between 1975 and 2000.
Overall, as per the graph fish and chips shows the decline trend, whereas pizza and hamburger increased significantly throughout the whole period.
To begin with, in 1975 Australian teenagers consider fish and chips as most popular food and eaten 100 times a year. which was far higher than Pizza and Hamburger, it was purchased only 5 times a year. While, over two following year, fish and chips experienced erratic trend and recorded almost 98 times in 1985. But over the following years, it followed downward trend and end with just below 40 times in a year in 2000.
Moving to pizza and hamburger, they started with fair similar trend, with gradual increase pizza overtook the fish and chips in 1990 and reached at its peak at approximately 83 times in 1995 afterward levelled off from till 2000. AS pe the Hamburger, it upsurged significantly and crossed the demand of fish and chips in 1985with about 80 time and finished at the same level where fish and chips began, with 100 times, remaining the most popular fast food in Australian youth in 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 52, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kind' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kinds'.
Suggestion: kinds
...aph compares the ratio of three various kind of junk food consumed by Australian you...
^^^^
Line 6, column 118, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...opular food and eaten 100 times a year. which was far higher than Pizza and Hamburger...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, whereas, while, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 6.8 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 990.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85294117647 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44711459841 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573529411765 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6254067231 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.75 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15970089743 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766103492978 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659845959375 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108530339411 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545032067754 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.