The graph illustrates information about the percentage of regional tools for houseworks which recycled by three countries in Europe over a ten-year period between 2005 and 2015.
Overall, what stands out of the graph is that there were significant increase tendency housework tools in the UK and Germany, while the recycle householding of France saw a considerable fall over the period in question. Another interesting point is that France was the most recycled households in 2005, but in 2009 the UK produced more tools than the others.
Looking at the details, as regards, Germany reproducing tools moved upward to 20 % from 2005 to 2011, while there was dramatical decrease in France, at which point leveled off at just under 30 % untill 2013. During these years, the UK improved to 5 % which, then the figure stabilized untill 2009. After that there was a gradual rise to around 25 % in 2011.
By contrast, producing in the UK and Germany went in the same percentage untill 2015. Over the period of 2015, France tools recovered to 20 % end of the year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se in France, at which point leveled off at just under 30 % untill 2013. During t...
^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...then the figure stabilized untill 2009. After that there was a gradual rise to around...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, then, while, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 877.0 1615.20841683 54% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 178.0 315.596192385 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92696629213 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 4.20363070211 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64411994824 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 176.041082164 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612359550562 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 506.74238477 50% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5639100043 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.625 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134164880664 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590702424766 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068880226694 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0971256265424 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0797490965037 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 50.2224549098 132% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 78.4519038076 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.