the line graph below shows the number of accidents by vehicle type over a 5-year-period in luxemburg
Contained in the line graph is data pertaining to accidents happening in Luxemburg by vehicle type from 1990 to 2004. The gist of the infographic is that the dominant trend for all of the features was one of growth.
Beginning with road and railway accidents,it is obvious that the ranges between the figures were tangible. As far as rail accidents were concerned, the figures languished around 5000 during the 5 initial years before the began to rise continuously to approximately 2000 as the period ended. The case was similar in connection with road accidents as it experienced an erratic increase from exactly 15000 to an apex of well over 30000 in 2001. However, their figures had fallen back to 25000 by 2004.
Turning to boat accidents, The difference between the high and low points was noticeably less substantial. From 1990 to 1993, it stayed constant at just north of 10000 during the subsequent 4-year period. Over the remaining years, it had exhibited a fall to under 10000 by 2001 before bouncing back to precisely 15000 in 2004.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ographic is that the dominant trend for all of the features was one of growth. Beginnin...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...eginning with road and railway accidents,it is obvious that the ranges between the ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 873.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93220338983 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69519358025 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627118644068 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6312611776 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.88888888889 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195370581833 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690561959575 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0968069059026 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131048286464 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674525682703 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.