These two given graphs illustrate the data about the number of visitors, who visited
Australia, from accross the globe during 1975 and 2005. An interesting point to be noted that the count of tourists had increased over these time frame.
Overall analysis, the unit of visitors is in a million. Furthermore, X axis represents the years, whereas different regions people along with the number of people are indicated by Y axis. Additionally, South Korean and Japanees people were more interested to visit Australia as compare to the other national people.
It is clear from these graphs that, the number of oversease residents, who travelled to Australia, began at about 9 millions in 1975 and peaked at more than 30 millions in 2005. In addition, Australia remained popular destination for people of Japan during this time period, starting with 3.2 millions in 1975 and dramatically climbed to 12 millions in 2005, while least number of people from China was interested to visit there. Only 0.3 millions Chineese people were visited Australia in 1975 and remained lowest with 0.8 millions in 2005.
Stating further, Australia was the second popular destination for South Korean people in 1975 with 2.9 millions and held the same position in 2005 with 9.1 millions. Conversely, the second least count was for USA individuals, starting at 0.4 millions and reached to 1.1 millions in these given years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bout the number of visitors, who visited Australia, from accross the globe during...
^^^
Line 6, column 360, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'while the least'.
Suggestion: while the least
...tically climbed to 12 millions in 2005, while least number of people from China was interes...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, furthermore, if, second, so, whereas, while, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1182.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1615720524 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6305975514 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554585152838 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5932455078 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.2 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116376638207 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562637316628 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449848293248 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0729858620264 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371564633441 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.