The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The line chart gives information about the oil produced and consumed in China from 1982 to 2006.
Overall, the rate of both oil consumption and production followed an upward trend over the period shown. Besides, there was a dramatic change in the figure for the production of oil between 1986 to 2006.
In 1982 there were around 2 millions of oil barrels produced per day in China while nearly 2 millions of oil barrels was consumed. Over the next four years, a significant increase of one million was witnessed in the amount of oil production and then reached a plateau in the next eight years. Also, the Chinese consumption of oil almost remained unchanged from 1982 to 1990.
In 1994, the production and consumption of oil started at the same amount of 3 million barrels per day. In the second half of the period, the figure for oil production increased slowly by 0,5 million and hit the highest point in 2006. Whereas the period between 1994 to 2006 saw a significant increase of around 3 million in the amount of oil consumption.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 27, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '2 million'.
Suggestion: 2 million
...986 to 2006. In 1982 there were around 2 millions of oil barrels produced per day in China w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '2 million'.
Suggestion: 2 million
... produced per day in China while nearly 2 millions of oil barrels was consumed. Over the next...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 235, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lion and hit the highest point in 2006. Whereas the period between 1994 to 2006 saw a s...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, second, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72527472527 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58293191044 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494505494505 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.7205242506 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.5555555556 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239401235949 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118508468948 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493927723954 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172362777884 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405070834808 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.