The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006.
The line graph provides information about the production and consumption of oil in china over 24 years. The data is in the number of million oil barrels per day.
Overall, it is seen clearly from the given line chart that the consumption rate rose throughout the time, while the production figure remained the same in the given period after a rise.
To comments with, as regards the consumption number, accounted for below 2 million barrel per day in the year 1982, which remained constant in the following eight years. After that, the trend of oil consumption in China started an upward trend in the next sixteen years. Lastly, it was over 5 million barrels per day by 2006, which was nearly two times higher than the production ratio.
Furthermore, the initial figure for the overall production rate of oil comprised closely 2.2 million barrels per day in the year 1982, and inclined of 1 million barrels was observed by 1986. It remained at the same position in the next twenty years in China.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, lastly, while, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 833.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81502890173 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47158329418 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543352601156 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6486125188 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.125 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278217306111 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125478034937 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907563869626 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178638695042 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0803364319057 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.