The line graph compares the proportion of traveler from England visited in Brighton between 1980 and 2010.
Overall it is clear that the number of passengers who visited the Pavilion was the highest. By contrast, The figure for tourists who visited the Pier accounted for a very small proportion over the period show.
We can see that Festival where is significantly higher than three different attractions in Brighton, at around 25% in 1980, after which this figure fell sharply to 38% in 2010. It was noticeable that the amount of
Pier was the lowest and stayed relatively stable from 12% to 20% over the whole 30 year-period show.
Turning to the remaining, in terms of Art Gallery and Pavilion, we can see that the percentage of Pavilion accounted for 22% in 1980, at which point this figure started to fall sharply to 49% in 1995 and this was followed by a sharp fall to 32% throughout the period show. In addition, Art Galery has double the number of tourists visited more than Pavilion. Above 35% of travelers who visited Brighton, while there was a significant decline in 2010 made up 8% during the period show.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted in Brighton between 1980 and 2010. Overall it is clear that the number of p...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...small proportion over the period show. We can see that Festival where is signif...
^^^
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...10. It was noticeable that the amount of Pier was the lowest and stayed relativel...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0% over the whole 30 year-period show. Turning to the remaining, in terms of Ar...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76923076923 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53447498411 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558974358974 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0601382315 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.25 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177268880697 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852132191435 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407708602594 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102979243175 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443119079876 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.