The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.
The chart compares the proportion of tourists to England who visited Brighton attractions including the art gallery, pavilion, pier, and festival between 1980 and 2010. From a general perspective, different trends in the percentage of travelers could be observed, consist of a grown of pavilion and pier, a reduction of art gallery and festival.
In 1980, the festival had the highest percentage of tourists at 30%, followed by the pavilion, art gallery, and pier. From 1980 to 1995, people preferred to visit the pavilion, which witnessed a huge rise to nearly a half in the proportion of tourists, significantly surpassing the other places' percentage of travelers. On the other hand, the festival's percentage of tourists experienced a considerable fall from 30% to 25%. At the end of this period, the art gallery's percentage of tourists stayed at 21%; meanwhile, the pier saw a slight increase to 12% in the proportion of tourists.
In the next fifteen years, despite a substantial decline, the pavilion was still at the top of the percentage of tourists. Similarly, the art gallery plummeted to under 10%, making this attraction fall behind the pier, which considerably grew about 10% in the percentage of tourists. Meanwhile, the festival's proportion of tourists had no significant changes over the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...80 and 2010. From a general perspective, different trends in the percentage of tr...
^^
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'places'' or 'place's'?
Suggestion: places'; place's
...sts, significantly surpassing the other places percentage of travelers. On the other h...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'festivals'' or 'festival's'?
Suggestion: festivals'; festival's
...ge of travelers. On the other hand, the festivals percentage of tourists experienced a co...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f the percentage of tourists. Similarly, the art gallery plummeted to under 10%, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, still, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1106.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24170616114 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02770537582 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521327014218 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1346615815 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.888888889 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189470496676 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863869048011 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588709984779 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143159503771 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548202216885 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.