The line graph shows changing patterns of business communication in New Stratford from 1980 to 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The line graph illustrates the trend patterns of business communication in New Stratford over the last 25 years from 1980 to 2005.

There are two basic general trends: downward and upward. As a regard the first, the trend for letters was down over the period, falling significantly from 19 million to 2 million. Likewise, the trend for landline phones also ended the period down. The landline phone was the most common type of business communication from 1980 to 1990 and then the number of these phone calls declined from 35 million to almost 22 million a day in 2005.

By contrast, the changes for the other three types of communications went up by varying degrees. People did not use any other internet communication in business in 1980; It started in 1985 and rose gradually to 8 million communication a day in 2005. Furthermore, the trend for the cell phone and emails also ended the period up in 2005. They both started with 2 million in 1980, then increased slightly till 1995 and after that climbed sharply till 2005.

Overall, business communication that mostly held in letters and landline phone calls in 1980 moved practically fully to emails and different phone calls by 2005.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tions went up by varying degrees. People did not use any other internet communica...
^^
Line 5, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...It started in 1985 and rose gradually to 8 million communication a day in 2005. ...
^^
Line 5, column 237, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se gradually to 8 million communication a day in 2005. Furthermore, the trend fo...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, likewise, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 997.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91133004926 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67717561729 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546798029557 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4634402887 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21780487683 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929125662413 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10359523574 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173635722976 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113999184941 0.0819641961636 139% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.