The line graph shows the size of the global population from 1400 to 2000, and the pie charts show the global population by region in 1900 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
In this infographic, there are 3 charts (a line graph and 2 pie charts). The presented line graph clearly presents the number of people, measured in billions, around the world between 1400 and 2000, while the pie charts well compare the proportion of people by each 6 selected parts of the world in 1900 and 2000.
In the given line graph, it is evident that the figure of world population increased from below 500 million in 1400 to about 1.3 billion in 1700 and then dipped slightly to 1 billion in 1800. After that, there was a growth in that of those to 6 billion in 2000.
In pie charts, it can be explained that in 1900, most of the population (60%) were Asian; however, this proportion declined gently in next one year (54%). Similarly, the number of European decreased from 24 % to 14 % throughout those mentioned years. On the other hand, the figures of Latin American and those of African rose by 5 % and 8 % respectively a decade later. Finally, it is interesting that the percentage of people in North America and those of the left parts almost levelled off at 5.5 % on average.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 263, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in that of those to 6 billion in 2000. In pie charts, it can be explained that ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, similarly, then, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5641025641 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52443558048 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605128205128 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7918844905 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.25 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212717378455 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814165353339 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676236444558 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141227607687 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705777812869 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.