The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph line illustrates the, ratio of automobile rubbed in different four countries in between a decade.
Overall, as per the graph, Swedenm France and Canada follow the fairly similar trend, while great Britain far exceed than others and remain highest for car stolen throughout the time frame.
To begin with, the three countries, Sweden, France and Canada experience the similar behavior from 1990 to 1993, the figure remain around between 5 to 10 per thousand a year. Although with tiny fluctuation in between 5 to 10 per thousand, France and Canada end with almost same figure, 6 thousand per year, which is also the least ratio of car theft. However, Sweden increase gradually after 1993 and reached up to roughly 13 thousand per year in 1996 and remain identical till following two years. With a mild increase end up with just below 15 thousand per year.
Moving to Great Britain, In the beginning year it was recorded approximately 18 thousand and with some erratic pattern it reached its peak in 1996 with almost 20 thousand per year. Afterward, the following three years it start decreasing and finished by reaching around same level of beginning point, 17 per thousand in a year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 28, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'the'?
The graph line illustrates the, ratio of automobile rubbed in different...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97524752475 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4684312087 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59900990099 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8197108854 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.625 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163552368219 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0871250412042 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472768839398 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109107154422 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054909315131 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.