The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph line illustrates the, ratio of automobile rubbed in different four countries, measured in thousand per year, in between 1990 and 1999.
Overall, as per the graph, Sweden France and Canada follow the fairly similar trend, while great Britain far exceed than others and remain highest for car stolen throughout the time frame.
To begin with, the three countries, Sweden, France and Canada experience the similar behavior from 1990 to 1993, the figure remain around between 5 to 10 per thousand a year. Although with tiny fluctuation in between 5 to 10 per thousand, France and Canada end with almost same figure, at 6 thousand per year, which is also the least ratio of car theft. However, Sweden increased gradually after 1993 and reached up to roughly 13 thousand per year in 1996 and remain identical till following two years. With a mild increased in figure, end up with just below 15 thousand per year.
Moving to Great Britain, beginning year it was recorded approximately 18 thousand, which far exceeded than others, with some erratic pattern it reached its peak in 1996 with almost 20 thousand per year. Afterward, the following three years it started decreasing and finished by reaching around same level of beginning point, 17 per thousand in a year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 28, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'the'?
The graph line illustrates the, ratio of automobile rubbed in different...
^^^^
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...n different four countries, measured in thousand per year, in between 1990 and 1999. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 25, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d per year. Moving to Great Britain, beginning year it was recorded approxima...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1070.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0234741784 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4727927274 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577464788732 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2904946232 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.75 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169236862515 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956817498993 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698180984159 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127540495247 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850618638361 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.