The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999, and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999.
The line graph depicts the number of visitors, who visited the UK and from the UK in million from 1979 to 1999, while the bar chart illustrates the most popular and least popular country among UK residents in 1999.
Overall, as shown in the bar chart tourist who visits abroad from the UK are higher than who visit the UK, whereas France was the most demanded touristic destination for UK resident.
To begin with, both graph line visit to the UK and from the UK follow the increasing trend throughout the year, while visit abroad by UK citizens exceeds the graph. Both graphs start with almost similar ratio with around 10 million in 1979, but visitors who visit abroad from the UK rose significantly and end with over 50 million. However, people who visit the UK rose gradually and finished with just under 30 million.
Turning to the bar chart, in 1999 the most famous touristic place for UK citizens was France, where over 10 million UK visitors reached there and this was followed by Spain with approximately 10 million. Moreover, the USA, Greek, and Turkey were far less and accounted for under 5 million. However, turkey was the least popular country for UK residents.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...visitors, who visited UK and from UK in million from 1979 to 1999, while the bar chart ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, whereas, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84615384615 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34692575224 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5507936449 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.125 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.468373282658 0.215688989381 217% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.231449428357 0.103423049105 224% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.184876423806 0.0843802449381 219% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.339394537559 0.15604864568 217% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.179028058579 0.0819641961636 218% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.